The article uses biased language to describe Putin as an authoritarian and his war on Ukraine as brutal, reinforcing a negative perception of Putin and his actions.
The article highlights Carlson's sympathetic stance towards Putin and his previous comments on Ukraine to divert attention from the fact that Carlson provided a platform for Putin's propaganda.
The article selectively reports on Carlson's interview with Putin, focusing on the lack of challenging questions and the promotion of conspiracy theories, while ignoring any potential critical or informative aspects of the interview.
The article simplifies the complex issues discussed in the interview, such as Russia's war crimes and the imprisonment of Alexei Navalny, by stating that Carlson did not press Putin on these topics.
The article presents a false balance by giving equal weight to Putin's propaganda and the truth without challenging or scrutinizing Putin's claims.
The article points out that Putin advanced a conspiracy theory about the U.S. government being controlled by unelected powers at the CIA, and criticizes Carlson for not challenging or debunking it.
The article quotes CNN's chief international correspondent, Clarissa Ward, to support the claim that Carlson did not have control during the interview and that it was a propaganda victory for Putin.
The article highlights how Putin's state-run media amplified the interview and gained millions of viewers, suggesting that it was a significant propaganda victory for Putin.
The article includes a quote from Carlson asking Putin about the release of a specific imprisoned reporter, which is presented without the full context of the interview.
The article repeatedly emphasizes that Carlson did not challenge or scrutinize Putin's claims, reinforcing the idea that the interview was a platform for Putin's propaganda.
The article frames Carlson's interview with Putin as a missed opportunity for critical journalism, contrasting it with the denial of access to actual journalists who would have pressed Putin on critical issues.
The article accuses Carlson of manipulating facts by suggesting that the imprisoned reporter for The Wall Street Journal was breaking the law, which is disputed by The Journal and labeled as fiction.
Clarissa Ward, CNN’s chief international correspondent, remarked, adding that it was “clear from the very beginning” of the interview that Carlson did “not have control.”
Immediately after Carlson published the chat online, Putin’s mouthpieces rushed to amplify it. TASS featured the sit-down as the top story on its homepage, amplifying Putin’s claim that Ukraine is an “artificial state” and devoting an entire section of its website to special coverage of the interview.
RT, the English-language broadcaster now exiled from much of the Western world, aired significant swaths of the interview on its air. “VLADIMIR PUTIN’S INTERVIEW GAINS OVER 20 MILLION VIEWERS IN FIRST TWO HOURS,” RT boasted in one on-screen graphic.
Putin’s own spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, told reporters this week that Carlson was selected because he “has a position that is different from the rest” of Western media.
Ted Mann, a reporter at the newspaper, wrote on X that it was “disgraceful of Carlson to suggest Evan was ‘breaking [their] law.’” “He wasn’t,” Mann added. “Carlson knows that. Evan is a law-abiding, decent reporter being held hostage for geopolitical leverage. He should be released immediately.”
The Journal also released a statement following the interview. “Evan is a journalist, and journalism is not a crime. Any portrayal to the contrary is total fiction,” the newspaper said. “Evan was unjustly arrested and has been wrongfully detained by Russia for nearly a year for doing his job, and we continue to demand his immediate release.”