The text uses biased language to describe the government's actions and economic situation in Bolivia.

The text selectively reports on the government's economic measures in Bolivia, focusing on certain aspects while omitting others to shape a specific narrative.

The text directs attention away from certain aspects of the economic situation in Bolivia to focus on specific measures taken by the government.

The text simplifies the complex economic issues in Bolivia to present a more straightforward narrative.

The text stereotypes the government's economic policies as being solely influenced by the MAS party and portrays them in a negative light.

The text uses quotes from experts and former government officials to lend credibility to the information presented.

The text selectively chooses data and information to support a particular viewpoint while ignoring other relevant data.

The text frames the government's economic measures as a departure from previous policies and as a response to a crisis, shaping the reader's perception.

The text presents a false equivalence between different economic viewpoints and policies, potentially misleading the reader.

The text manipulates facts and information to support a particular narrative about the economic situation in Bolivia.

The text uses language that instills fear or anxiety about the economic situation in Bolivia.

The text includes quotes from experts and officials that may be taken out of context to support a particular argument.

The text appeals to emotions by highlighting the potential negative consequences of the economic situation in Bolivia.

The text repeats certain points and arguments to emphasize their importance and potentially influence the reader.

The text presents a false balance by giving equal weight to different viewpoints without considering their validity or relevance.

The text does not contain conspiracy theories.

The text does not contain clickbait headlines.

The text does not contain sarcasm.