Pengembangan dan eksplorasi untuk proyek pembangkit listrik tenaga panas bumi di Indonesia dikhawatirkan mengancam lingkungan dan kesehatan warga. Butuh kajian dalam pengembangan energi tersebut.
The use of terms like 'agenda bisnis' suggests a bias against the government's promotion of geothermal energy, implying that it is primarily a business interest rather than a public good.
The text may be selectively reporting negative aspects of geothermal development, such as environmental damage and health threats, without providing a balanced view that includes the potential benefits or measures taken to mitigate negative impacts.
The text uses phrases like 'mengancam lingkungan dan kesehatan warga', 'merusak lingkungan', and 'mengancam kesehatan masyarakat' which are emotionally charged and designed to evoke concern or fear about the impact of geothermal projects on the environment and public health.
The text cites authorities like Jaringan Advokasi Tambang (Jatam) and researchers to support the claims made about the dangers of geothermal development, which can lend weight to the argument and persuade readers.
The text repeats the claim that geothermal work areas cover 3.9 million hectares and that these areas are crucial to the livelihoods of the residents, reinforcing the idea that geothermal development poses a significant threat to local communities.
By highlighting incidents of gas leaks and poisoning, and using phrases like 'lima warga tewas', the text may be accused of fear-mongering, as it emphasizes the dangers without discussing the likelihood of such events or the safety measures in place.
The text frames geothermal energy development as a conflict between government/business interests and the safety of local communities, which could influence the reader's perception of the issue.